Apathy Online

Today, I was talk­ing with a Chris­t­ian coworker, and men­tioned that some Chris­tians refuse to stand for a judge because they view all humans as equals. My coworker seemed per­plexed by the idea, thought it was silly, and barely avoided stat­ing that peo­ple who try to bring such beliefs into a court set­ting should be arrested. His rea­son­ing was that it was merely show­ing respect for the judge and has noth­ing to do with wor­ship. I do not nec­es­sar­ily believe that my coworker is wrong in stand­ing for a judge, should he be in a posi­tion to stand before one. How­ever, he does not believe in giv­ing oth­ers the abil­ity to live by their con­vic­tions, includ­ing other Chris­tians. While I believe it is a mat­ter between the a per­son and God, I view such Quakers/Christians/etc. that live their con­vic­tions as heroes. These are peo­ple who are will­ing to risk impris­on­ment for abid­ing by their con­science. As a for­mer pas­tor of mine pointed out, Cae­sar does not own your con­science, God does.

There is a rea­son why this both­ered me. I was try­ing to probe my cowork­ers beliefs (pri­mar­ily because he will dis­cuss ‘reli­gion’ or Christ with every other coworker but me, except to invite me to his church, but also because of my curios­ity). I have been try­ing to see what kind of a Chris­t­ian he was, and if he had good rea­sons for his beliefs. Per­haps my con­clu­sion is unfair, but he seems to be a typ­i­cal ‘con­ser­v­a­tive’ type: he con­fuses faith in Christ with an unques­tion­ing accep­tance of every­thing taught to him in a Chris­t­ian set­ting. Unfor­tu­nately, it seems as if the major­ity of Chris­tians I meet are this way.

What kind of Chris­tians are we if we believe this way? Of what value is our faith? We can quote scrip­ture ver­ba­tim, but our only under­stand­ing is what has been taught to us. Peo­ple ask us how to get to Heaven, and we imme­di­ately spit out an answer, with­out know­ing if it is true. It was just taught to us. Frankly, I am not cer­tain if most Chris­tians even know why they believe what they believe. At all. A cab dri­ver pointed this out to me years ago when he asked me some ques­tions about my faith. Since then, I have tried very hard to make sure my beliefs are con­sis­tent and true. (Does any­one remem­ber read­ing Philip­pi­ans 2:12?) Some do not really care to do this, and get their con­sis­tent and true beliefs on Sundays.

Mod­ern Chris­tian­ity seem to be no bet­ter than the other the­o­ries of life or reli­gions it derides. It rests sim­ply on a teach­ing that has been passed down from mul­ti­ple gen­er­a­tions of teach­ers in a game of gen­er­a­tional tele­phone with the cur­rent teach­ing being incred­i­bly far from the truth it once showed, and there is no desire to go to the begin­ning and rework our beliefs as nec­es­sary. We say to our­selves that “This is what we were taught, and any devi­a­tion from it is heresy.” Some­one raises an objec­tion to our beliefs and instead of hav­ing an answer or research­ing the ques­tion, we cite prob­lems with the ques­tioner. Did we not read from the Bible that we pro­claim to be true with­out know­ing why that we should study (2 Tim 2:15)? We are offended by Chris­tians in jail, for­get­ting in the Bible, per­se­cu­tion is nor­mal. For­get­ting God’s com­mand­ments, we try to force oth­ers to live the way we want. We advo­cate theft in Christ’s name. We serve some­one other than the Jesus in the Bible, and oth­ers know this. They mock us, not to per­se­cute us, but because our brand of chris­tian­ity deserves mock­ing. They are offended by us, because we offend them, and not because the core of our belief itself is offen­sive. We even have rules just like the reli­gious lead­ers Jesus crit­i­cized, but we have very intri­cate rea­sons for why our rules are not like theirs. We com­plain of peo­ple pick­ing and choos­ing what parts of the Bible they believe, but it may bet­ter to do that with a con­sis­tent belief than to man­date that every­thing be included for the sole rea­son of a vote long ago while tak­ing what we man­date as included and twist­ing and per­vert­ing it in ways the orig­i­nal authors/Author did not intend. There is a lot wrong with our chris­tian­ity! It’s not Christian!

To be fair, people’s beliefs change over time, and I too was once a zombie-christian: eat­ing the brains of other chris­tians to sus­tain me. Per­haps I am still that way to a degree (I’ve changed, hon­est!). Maybe this is a rant more about myself than a plea for oth­ers to con­sider them­selves. I could fill the rest of this spot with Philip­pi­ans 2:12, but I doubt it would help; I’ve read pas­sages hun­dreds of times before under­stand­ing them, and hun­dreds of times more before real­iz­ing I was abid­ing solely by a teach­ing rather than what the pas­sage plainly said. Per­haps it’s worth scrap­ping our ideas and rebuild­ing them from scratch?
And the ques­tion now is “what do I believe?” I believe that there is a Cre­ator. I believe that He came down in the form of Christ to show us how to live. I believe that he took the pun­ish­ment of the world when He died on the cross because he loved us, and to show us what love truly is: not killing or oppress­ing oth­ers because they don’t believe like you, but sac­ri­fic­ing your­self for oth­ers out of love for them. I believe that when Jesus stated that the great­est com­mand­ments were to love the Lord God with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength, and to love your neigh­bor as your­self, that He meant it. I believe all scrip­ture should be inter­preted in light of these two verses.

Share on Facebook

The new ver­sion would allow the pres­i­dent to “declare a cyber­se­cu­rity emer­gency” relat­ing to “non–gov­ern­mental” com­puter net­works and do what’s nec­es­sary to respond to the threat. Other sec­tions of the pro­posal include a fed­eral cer­ti­fi­ca­tion pro­gram for “cyber­se­cu­rity pro­fes­sion­als,” and a require­ment that cer­tain com­puter sys­tems and net­works in the pri­vate sec­tor be man­aged by peo­ple who have been awarded that license.

Share on Facebook

In an effort to get into peo­ples pants, Gov­ern­ment “offi­cials” are con­sid­er­ing pro­mot­ing or man­dat­ing uni­ver­sal cir­cum­ci­sion for all babies born in the US.

Share on Facebook

The United States gov­ern­ment is at another cross­roads. In a few months, the fed­eral gov­ern­ment will have a com­pletely social­ized health­care sys­tem, instead of the par­tially social­lized one that we have now. One would think that many Chris­tians would be against such a sys­tem, con­sid­er­ing that it is inher­ently immoral. Jay Seku­low, from the ACLJ, is com­pletely focused on just abor­tion being the issue with the bill, and is rais­ing money and work­ing hard to have all abor­tion related lan­guage removed from it. While it appears he is doing some­thing noble, he is wast­ing his time. Its not like any­thing new is hap­pen­ing here. While abor­tions would be funded by this bill, they are already par­tially sub­si­dized by money stolen from you via taxes through grants and other chan­nels. This bill only
makes the States sup­port for abor­tion obvi­ous. So, while the ACLJ spins their wheels try­ing to win this vic­tory against abor­tion, the State con­tin­ues to kill the unborn with your money. Because peo­ple are dis­tracted by fight­ing abor­tion, the health­care bill will prob­a­bly pass, and regard­less of any pres­ence of abor­tion related lan­guage, it would result in the deaths of many Amer­i­cans out­side the womb under the social­ized sys­tem! And even if the abor­tion related lan­guage is removed, state sub­si­dized abor­tions will con­tinue to take place, paid by you! The Chris­t­ian com­mu­nity is achiev­ing noth­ing by fight­ing abor­tion like this!

What must be done then? We need to strike at the root of this, and destroy the sys­tem that makes this pos­si­ble. Instead of sup­port­ing the State that is dia­met­ri­cally opposed to God, we need to oppose it com­pletely. Instead of wast­ing our time just fight­ing against abor­tion related lan­guage in an immoral bill that is likely to pass, we need to fight the bill itself. Chris­tians should be in an uproar, but not just because this bill funds abor­tion. This bill will increase the money stolen from peo­ple who earned it, use it to line the pock­ets of the tyran­ni­cal politi­cians and those in bed with them, and allow for the State to con­trol who is fit to live or die. The State is exact­ing the con­trol of the pop­u­la­tion as if it were a deity, and if we wait to late to oppose this sys­tem, our oppo­si­tion could be met with our deaths.

Share on Facebook

This much seems cer­tain about the Cash for Clunk­ers pro­gram: Con­sumers are happy to take gov­ern­ment rebates to buy new cars.

The fate of the $1 bil­lion trade-in pro­gram was up in the air late Thurs­day over con­cerns that it may have already burned through its funds less than a week after it was launched.

Con­gres­sional sources said ear­lier in the day that the pro­gram would be suspended.

Source: CNN Money

Share on Facebook