<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Kind of Christians Are We?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apathyonline.net/archives/212/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apathyonline.net/archives/212</link>
	<description>Just another anarchist blog ;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:59:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abigail</title>
		<link>http://apathyonline.net/archives/212#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>Abigail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apathyonline.net/?p=212#comment-560</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Abbie, The Antijingoist. The Antijingoist said: New post: What Kind of Christians Are We? http://bit.ly/4TxPjg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Abbie, The Antijingoist. The Antijingoist said: New post: What Kind of Christians Are We? <a href="http://bit.ly/4TxPjg" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4TxPjg</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antijingoist</title>
		<link>http://apathyonline.net/archives/212#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>antijingoist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 04:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apathyonline.net/?p=212#comment-411</guid>
		<description>I got that from a Chuck Baldwin sermon a while ago... Baldwin failed to mention that the entire story was not about taxes, and that it is about the hypocrisy of the religious leaders, who, according to their position, should not even had the coin in their possession! Perhaps I&#039;ll mention that in another blog post.
The only time Jesus pays, or endorses paying taxes, is when he has Peter fish for the tax money. That was to avoid offending others, because Jesus did not come to the earth over taxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got that from a Chuck Baldwin sermon a while ago&#8230; Baldwin failed to mention that the entire story was not about taxes, and that it is about the hypocrisy of the religious leaders, who, according to their position, should not even had the coin in their possession! Perhaps I&#039;ll mention that in another blog post.<br />
The only time Jesus pays, or endorses paying taxes, is when he has Peter fish for the tax money. That was to avoid offending others, because Jesus did not come to the earth over taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kataqu07</title>
		<link>http://apathyonline.net/archives/212#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>kataqu07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apathyonline.net/?p=212#comment-405</guid>
		<description>&quot;Cae&#173;sar does not own your con&#173;science, God does.&quot;

This probably made my week. I had never heard the verse about taxes applied in that way, before, and it makes a whole lot of sense. It&#039;s a whole ideology summed up in one sentence. Very insightful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Cae&shy;sar does not own your con&shy;science, God does.&quot;</p>
<p>This probably made my week. I had never heard the verse about taxes applied in that way, before, and it makes a whole lot of sense. It&#039;s a whole ideology summed up in one sentence. Very insightful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chadd Hatfield</title>
		<link>http://apathyonline.net/archives/212#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Chadd Hatfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apathyonline.net/?p=212#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Your theological position is very Paulinean and sound, the problem with modern Christiandom is man, and the humanistic philosophy of religious fallacies that the 1st century Christians dealt with has not changed, thus agreeing with King Solomon when he indicated that there is nothing new under the sun.  We that claim to follow the Way of Christ, and believe that He died for our sins and arose on the third day to defeat death, and He is our Lord and God, must die daily to the flesh and seek the things above.  Though I agree with 80% of the free state systemology within the socio-political free state movement, I cannot deny that our God is a God of Agape not force.  God speed your fellow brother Rev. Chadd N. Hatfield, M.A.C.C. Head Chaplain of the Huntington City Misson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your theological position is very Paulinean and sound, the problem with modern Christiandom is man, and the humanistic philosophy of religious fallacies that the 1st century Christians dealt with has not changed, thus agreeing with King Solomon when he indicated that there is nothing new under the sun.  We that claim to follow the Way of Christ, and believe that He died for our sins and arose on the third day to defeat death, and He is our Lord and God, must die daily to the flesh and seek the things above.  Though I agree with 80% of the free state systemology within the socio-political free state movement, I cannot deny that our God is a God of Agape not force.  God speed your fellow brother Rev. Chadd N. Hatfield, M.A.C.C. Head Chaplain of the Huntington City Misson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention What Kind of Christians Are We? at Apathy Online -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://apathyonline.net/archives/212#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention What Kind of Christians Are We? at Apathy Online -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apathyonline.net/?p=212#comment-400</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Abbie, The Antijingoist. The Antijingoist said: New post: What Kind of Christians Are We? http://bit.ly/4TxPjg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Abbie, The Antijingoist. The Antijingoist said: New post: What Kind of Christians Are We? <a href="http://bit.ly/4TxPjg" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4TxPjg</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
