What Kind of Christians Are We?
Today, I was talking with a Christian coworker, and mentioned that some Christians refuse to stand for a judge because they view all humans as equals. My coworker seemed perplexed by the idea, thought it was silly, and barely avoided stating that people who try to bring such beliefs into a court setting should be arrested. His reasoning was that it was merely showing respect for the judge and has nothing to do with worship. I do not necessarily believe that my coworker is wrong in standing for a judge, should he be in a position to stand before one. However, he does not believe in giving others the ability to live by their convictions, including other Christians. While I believe it is a matter between the a person and God, I view such Quakers/Christians/etc. that live their convictions as heroes. These are people who are willing to risk imprisonment for abiding by their conscience. As a former pastor of mine pointed out, Caesar does not own your conscience, God does.
There is a reason why this bothered me. I was trying to probe my coworkers beliefs (primarily because he will discuss ‘religion’ or Christ with every other coworker but me, except to invite me to his church, but also because of my curiosity). I have been trying to see what kind of a Christian he was, and if he had good reasons for his beliefs. Perhaps my conclusion is unfair, but he seems to be a typical ‘conservative’ type: he confuses faith in Christ with an unquestioning acceptance of everything taught to him in a Christian setting. Unfortunately, it seems as if the majority of Christians I meet are this way.
What kind of Christians are we if we believe this way? Of what value is our faith? We can quote scripture verbatim, but our only understanding is what has been taught to us. People ask us how to get to Heaven, and we immediately spit out an answer, without knowing if it is true. It was just taught to us. Frankly, I am not certain if most Christians even know why they believe what they believe. At all. A cab driver pointed this out to me years ago when he asked me some questions about my faith. Since then, I have tried very hard to make sure my beliefs are consistent and true. (Does anyone remember reading Philippians 2:12?) Some do not really care to do this, and get their consistent and true beliefs on Sundays.
Modern Christianity seem to be no better than the other theories of life or religions it derides. It rests simply on a teaching that has been passed down from multiple generations of teachers in a game of generational telephone with the current teaching being incredibly far from the truth it once showed, and there is no desire to go to the beginning and rework our beliefs as necessary. We say to ourselves that “This is what we were taught, and any deviation from it is heresy.” Someone raises an objection to our beliefs and instead of having an answer or researching the question, we cite problems with the questioner. Did we not read from the Bible that we proclaim to be true without knowing why that we should study (2 Tim 2:15)? We are offended by Christians in jail, forgetting in the Bible, persecution is normal. Forgetting God’s commandments, we try to force others to live the way we want. We advocate theft in Christ’s name. We serve someone other than the Jesus in the Bible, and others know this. They mock us, not to persecute us, but because our brand of christianity deserves mocking. They are offended by us, because we offend them, and not because the core of our belief itself is offensive. We even have rules just like the religious leaders Jesus criticized, but we have very intricate reasons for why our rules are not like theirs. We complain of people picking and choosing what parts of the Bible they believe, but it may better to do that with a consistent belief than to mandate that everything be included for the sole reason of a vote long ago while taking what we mandate as included and twisting and perverting it in ways the original authors/Author did not intend. There is a lot wrong with our christianity! It’s not Christian!
To be fair, people’s beliefs change over time, and I too was once a zombie-christian: eating the brains of other christians to sustain me. Perhaps I am still that way to a degree (I’ve changed, honest!). Maybe this is a rant more about myself than a plea for others to consider themselves. I could fill the rest of this spot with Philippians 2:12, but I doubt it would help; I’ve read passages hundreds of times before understanding them, and hundreds of times more before realizing I was abiding solely by a teaching rather than what the passage plainly said. Perhaps it’s worth scrapping our ideas and rebuilding them from scratch?
And the question now is “what do I believe?” I believe that there is a Creator. I believe that He came down in the form of Christ to show us how to live. I believe that he took the punishment of the world when He died on the cross because he loved us, and to show us what love truly is: not killing or oppressing others because they don’t believe like you, but sacrificing yourself for others out of love for them. I believe that when Jesus stated that the greatest commandments were to love the Lord God with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength, and to love your neighbor as yourself, that He meant it. I believe all scripture should be interpreted in light of these two verses.
Pingback: Tweets that mention What Kind of Christians Are We? at Apathy Online -- Topsy.com
Your theological position is very Paulinean and sound, the problem with modern Christiandom is man, and the humanistic philosophy of religious fallacies that the 1st century Christians dealt with has not changed, thus agreeing with King Solomon when he indicated that there is nothing new under the sun. We that claim to follow the Way of Christ, and believe that He died for our sins and arose on the third day to defeat death, and He is our Lord and God, must die daily to the flesh and seek the things above. Though I agree with 80% of the free state systemology within the socio-political free state movement, I cannot deny that our God is a God of Agape not force. God speed your fellow brother Rev. Chadd N. Hatfield, M.A.C.C. Head Chaplain of the Huntington City Misson.
"Caesar does not own your conscience, God does."
This probably made my week. I had never heard the verse about taxes applied in that way, before, and it makes a whole lot of sense. It's a whole ideology summed up in one sentence. Very insightful.
I got that from a Chuck Baldwin sermon a while ago… Baldwin failed to mention that the entire story was not about taxes, and that it is about the hypocrisy of the religious leaders, who, according to their position, should not even had the coin in their possession! Perhaps I'll mention that in another blog post.
The only time Jesus pays, or endorses paying taxes, is when he has Peter fish for the tax money. That was to avoid offending others, because Jesus did not come to the earth over taxes.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Abbie, The Antijingoist. The Antijingoist said: New post: What Kind of Christians Are We? http://bit.ly/4TxPjg [...]
Since you claim not to be a blind believer in Christian theology, then how can you believe in an external Creator, someone who reigns outside one's mind, heart or soul, therefore independent thereof? Does that not mean that you believe in the sovereignty of an authority, which is superior to, outside of and controlling you? If your answer to this is yes, then does this not contradict the fact that you are a being with volition?
If you believe God created time, then you would understand that he operates outside of it.
Though, I don't really know what your question is.
If you believe that the State is not a valid means of self-control, source of liberty or governing body, through which two or more people may unite, then why is God a valid means of self-control, source of liberty or governing body, through which two or more people may unite? Or, do you see God as merely the author of a religion (spiritual values), which has nothing to do with self-determination, self-government or freedom?
I see God as the creator of everything, who would like us to love him, and love each other, but will not force us to.
How about God as a source of liberty, self-government and freedom, independent of the use of physical force or the threat thereof, independent of our terrestrial self or any surrogate on behalf thereof, and independent of a material or ethical dichotomy between the self from whom we live and the self from whom all may live, independent of time or place, in relationship with God?